Women on the Australian Home Front in WW1

Part of the NSW Stage 5 History syllabus (the 'Australians at War' study) includes a dot point highlighting the role of women in WWI and WWII. I was led down a rabbit hole while researching this for WWI in particular and came up with the following lesson, which seemed to work well with my class last week. 

Anyway, here's the lesson:

1. Start with a definition activity for the word 'home front'. I actually do this for nearly all of my classes - History and English alike; I feel that improving metalanguage and general vocabulary is one of the key building blocks for learning. There's a lot of research in literacy that suggests that the best way to teach a new word is to get the students to use it in context, so I simply chuck the word up on the board and tell students to put it into a sentence, any sentence that makes sense, and I try to walk around checking on individual students to see how they've gone. It's a good settling routine.

2. After reinforcing the idea of the home front and what it is, have the class contribute to the construction of a mindmap that covers the lives of pre-war women in Australia. Branches of this mindmap could include things such as:

• Division of labour - men worked, women ran the household. In poorer families, women helped with work. It was considered important to keep the father well-fed as he was the only 'working' parent a lot of the time. 
• Women were housewives and their workload was intense - nearly all food was made from scratch and lots of clothes were too. Discuss things like the lack of refrigerators and how this might impact on home life, what would happen if clothing ripped, what a washboard was, etc.
• Women were mothers - it was common in this era to have an average of 10 to 12 children.
• Women's rights - women had gained the right to vote, state by state, only quite recently. The last state that established the right for women to vote was in 1911, only 3 years before the war broke out. 

This can then pivot into a class discussion of how the above might have changed once all the men went off to war. How would women have been impacted by this? 

3. Organise a lottery =- students draw letters (A to L) out of a hat or box [you'll need to just write these onto little slips of paper]. Students then search for their corresponding description in the following document; The Role of Women in WWI. After finding out what 'their' role might have been as a woman in WW1-era Australia, students should read the accompanying detail and respond to the following questions:

4. The Role of Women in World War I

A. What role did you get?

B. What was your role in World War I?

C. How did your role come about?

D. How helpful do you think you were in comparison to the other roles that have been listed?

E. How appreciative do you think people in Australia were of you at the time?

F. If there was a war like WWI today, do you think you would be needed in the same way? Why or why not?

G. Create a poster that advertises your role's contribution or belief. 

The above questions start at the simple and then move into the evaluative and empathy-based, with explicit regard given to context, thus highlighting continuity and change over time. 

I didn't plan it this way but this activity was timed well to coincide with ANZAC Day!

We will remember them. 

Lest we forget. 

Conversations about Hag-Seed

Epigraphs

The Advanced English Textual Conversations module provides an option to study the pairing of Shakespeare's The Tempest and Margaret Atwood's Hag-Seed. It's an accessible and popular option, and there's an ever-increasing amount of material becoming available to assist teachers and students. I usually approach the pairing by having students read The Tempest in one go, and then looking at Shakespeare's text through the lens of Hag-Seed. 

One of the literary structural conceits used by Atwood in her novel is the epigraph. In this context, an epigraph is the use of a quote or phrase at the beginning of a text to 'prime' the reader. This is a form of textual allusion, which is fitting when we consider that Hag-Seed itself is a giant piece of textual allusion. Atwood isn't shy in this regard, she uses not one epigraph but three.

Here's a sheet that invites students to analyse the epigraphs: The Art of the Epigraph in Hag-Seed

In this activity, students:

• Look at what an epigraph is and how it functions.
• Consider what each epigraph specifically says about Hag-Seed and/or why Atwood has chosen this particular quote to use. 
• Take the intertextuality a step further by using a quote from either The Tempest or Hag-Seed as an epigraph for their own piece of writing.

Epigraphs are important for Advanced students to learn about because they exist as a higher order form of comprehension. They are a sophisticated (and potentially obscure) way for writers to experiment with abstraction, a way to distil the essence or thematic core of a piece of writing, or to even ironically write against the idea of a piece. 

Socratic Discussion

Another way of getting Advanced students to better comprehend the textual conversation between The Tempest and Hag-Seed is the use of Socratic circles. This allows for the generation of discussion about the texts without focusing too much on lower order skills like grammar and sentence construction. 

I've already written about this approach a while back if you're interested (Socratic circles) and, for the purposes of this blog entry, I've included some useful discussion questions below. I like to use these questions around the halfway mark in the module - they're intended to push quieter students into forming and voicing opinions, and can also give struggling writers an opportunity to demonstrate their advanced thinking. The beauty of Socratic discussion is in sparking a single comment from a more forthright student and then watching other students build on this or react to it. 

Anyway, here are the questions:

• Does Prospero have the right to enslave Caliban?
• Prospero's most prized possession is his books and he arranges to take these with him to the island, along with his daughter. What two items would you take?
• Should Prospero have forgiven Antonio? Does he have a right to revenge?
• Felix tells himself to 'trust the play' but then questions himself with 'but is the play trustworthy?' What do you think is meant by this?
• Thinking of Caliban and the inmates in Hag-Seed, which is more influential - nature or nurture?
• In what way is Miranda a product of her time?
• Prospero was overthrown by his own brother, which is indicative of a familiar thread in Shakespeare's plays. What is this theme and is it still relevant today?
• Who is more justified in his methods - Prospero or Felix?
• In what way is the theme of 'performance' relevant to our everyday lives?
• Who is 'the Other' in our society? Are they fairly represented in the media? Fairly represented in Shakespeare's time? Is Caliban a racist stereotype?
• Would The Tempest as a play be better off without the characters of Stephano and Trinculo?
• If Prospero were an allegory for Shakespeare himself, who would be the closest equivalent for Margaret Atwood in Hag-Seed?
• In what way does Hag-Seed succeed in updating The Tempest for a modern day audience?
• In what way does it fail?
• Should any text be fair game for adaptation or sequelising? 

I've asked these questions to a range of students and it's genuinely fascinating to hear the discussions that emerge, to see the way in which conversations fold over the top of each other, and the ideas that are extended through Socratic discussion. 

They could probably even work as a writing activity for individual students who need further extension.